Upload all models and assets for chy (20251201)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,8 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,553 @@
+---
+language: chy
+language_name: CHY
+language_family: american_algonquian
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - monolingual
+  - family-american_algonquian
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: feature-extraction
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 3.456
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.0028
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 1659
+generated: 2025-12-28
+---
+
+# CHY - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **CHY** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3 and 4)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Summary & Recommendations](#6-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.426x | 3.37 | 0.0811% | 33,276 |
+| **16k** | 3.456x 🏆 | 3.40 | 0.0819% | 32,987 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Môxéhéó'o (vé'ho'énêstsestôtse: broom, "sweeping [thing]") Pl: môxéheonôtse.
+
+
+C...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁môxéhéó ' o ▁( vé ' ho ' énêstsestôtse : ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+| 16k | `▁môxéhéó ' o ▁( vé ' ho ' énêstsestôtse : ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Brazil, na'éstse ho'e-éve, Amérika.
+
+Category:Brazil`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁brazil , ▁na ' éstse ▁ho ' e - éve ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 16k | `▁brazil , ▁na ' éstse ▁ho ' e - éve ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Boise, na'éstse manâhéno, Idaho.
+
+Category:Mâhoestôtse`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁boise , ▁na ' éstse ▁manâhéno , ▁idaho . ▁category ... (+2 more)` | 12 |
+| 16k | `▁boise , ▁na ' éstse ▁manâhéno , ▁idaho . ▁category ... (+2 more)` | 12 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 16k achieves 3.456x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0811% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | 237 🏆 | 7.89 | 654 | 65.5% | 100.0% |
+| **2-gram** | 360 🏆 | 8.49 | 1,127 | 58.7% | 99.4% |
+| **3-gram** | 533 | 9.06 | 1,211 | 49.6% | 95.0% |
+| **3-gram** | 1,561 | 10.61 | 4,876 | 32.9% | 74.3% |
+| **4-gram** | 1,077 | 10.07 | 2,302 | 37.1% | 77.9% |
+| **4-gram** | 3,419 | 11.74 | 11,151 | 25.8% | 57.5% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams:**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `category :` | 973 |
+| 2 | `' e` | 663 |
+| 3 | `ho '` | 511 |
+| 4 | `' o` | 391 |
+| 5 | `. category` | 332 |
+
+**3-grams:**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `. category :` | 331 |
+| 2 | `na ' éstse` | 288 |
+| 3 | `' ho '` | 225 |
+| 4 | `| thumb |` | 204 |
+| 5 | `| right |` | 201 |
+
+**4-grams:**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `, na ' éstse` | 199 |
+| 2 | `| thumb | right` | 167 |
+| 3 | `thumb | right |` | 155 |
+| 4 | `vé ' ho '` | 131 |
+| 5 | `300px | thumb |` | 128 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram with 237
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~58% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | 0.3489 | 1.274 | 2.42 | 4,255 | 65.1% |
+| **1** | 1.3997 | 2.638 | 10.97 | 189 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | 0.1560 | 1.114 | 1.36 | 10,197 | 84.4% |
+| **2** | 1.2345 | 2.353 | 5.27 | 2,073 | 0.0% |
+| **3** | 0.0936 | 1.067 | 1.18 | 13,745 | 90.6% |
+| **3** | 0.6401 | 1.558 | 2.32 | 10,919 | 36.0% |
+| **4** | 0.0555 🏆 | 1.039 | 1.10 | 16,004 | 94.5% |
+| **4** | 0.2796 🏆 | 1.214 | 1.44 | 25,260 | 72.0% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples
+
+Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `' konénėhesó - éve . manâhestôtse 7 heše ' tavö ' éhoo ' he tsénėxhésemé '`
+2. `, na ' he tsénėxhésemé ' evo ' éno ' e 1904 , na ' otsenáhkohe`
+3. `: turkey , na ' o tsétsêhéstâhese - éve . gus . curitiba - éve .`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `category : ó ' he ( vé ' ho ' énestse 71 , 740 6 , 418`
+2. `' e 300px | thumb | amâho ' hestôtse amêške tsémo ' ôhtávoome amâho ' hestôtse category`
+3. `ho ' xó ' mâhoéve ' ho ' énêstsestôtse : purgatoire river , picketwire river ) -`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `. category : mâhoestôtse category : california`
+2. `na ' éstse ho ' e - éve hóxovê - hooma , asia ) . *`
+3. `' ho ' e - éve , meško . category : mâhoestôtse category : ho ' honáeo '`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `, na ' éstse ho ' e - éve , amérika . *`
+2. `| thumb | right | hóxeeséeto ' hamestôtse 300px | thumb | right | méstaa ' êhéhe category :`
+3. `thumb | right | hotóhkeo ' o tsénésôhtôxese 300px | thumb | right | mámaa ' e mámaa '`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 with 94.5% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (25,260 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 1,659 |
+| Total Tokens | 14,360 |
+| Mean Frequency | 8.66 |
+| Median Frequency | 3 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 38.60 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | category | 974 |
+| 2 | e | 690 |
+| 3 | ho | 531 |
+| 4 | o | 414 |
+| 5 | na | 293 |
+| 6 | éstse | 288 |
+| 7 | right | 260 |
+| 8 | éve | 259 |
+| 9 | thumb | 226 |
+| 10 | vé | 180 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | evenóse | 2 |
+| 2 | mountain | 2 |
+| 3 | cal | 2 |
+| 4 | poly | 2 |
+| 5 | mustangs | 2 |
+| 6 | sevonévo | 2 |
+| 7 | ėstovátamevéotse | 2 |
+| 8 | ėstova | 2 |
+| 9 | nėstse | 2 |
+| 10 | 2025 | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 0.8829 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.980523 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 57.7% |
+| Top 1,000 | 90.8% |
+| Top 5,000 | 0.0% |
+| Top 10,000 | 0.0% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9805 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 57.7% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** -8,341 words needed for remaining 100.0% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+### Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Vocab Size | Dimension | Avg Norm | Std Norm | Isotropy |
+|-------|------------|-----------|----------|----------|----------|
+| **mono_32d** | 223 | 32 | 1.577 | 0.877 | 0.0028 🏆 |
+| **mono_64d** | 223 | 64 | 1.556 | 0.897 | 0.0009 |
+| **mono_128d** | 223 | 128 | 1.593 | 0.888 | 0.0002 |
+| **embeddings_enhanced** | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0000 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.0028 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Dimension Trade-off:** Higher dimensions capture more semantics but reduce isotropy
+- **Vocabulary Coverage:** All models cover 223 words
+- **Recommendation:** 100d for balanced semantic capture and efficiency
+
+---
+## 6. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **32k BPE** | Best compression (3.46x) with low UNK rate |
+| N-gram | **5-gram** | Lowest perplexity (237) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (94.5%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  publisher = {HuggingFace},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2025-12-28 22:42:59*

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9abb00efdaee95eb235694ba4738708972eef813303beafecc2c4852c0a11360
+size 1024233321

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "chy", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "language": "chy",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "dim": 128,
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 223
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8c8e4f25fd101e1917ce06bf1768de9245362d868e23a5ebbbc943b0e4650a60
+size 256062057

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "chy", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "language": "chy",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "dim": 32,
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 223
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4c920935ac87a1441f862361919b9313ce17a00634fb4b6dc1a1bb483d79a2f5
+size 512119145

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "chy", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/chy_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "language": "chy",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "dim": 64,
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 223
+}

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6ea83b117f3a486981315ed6c06f66c8b179b52afa64753b10adcb037d01a299
+size 19111

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 189,
+  "total_transitions": 113177
+}

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cc4389e4a77f6c71ab2c352c280e4fc1281ab64c25a40abbcf7af73411115bda
+size 71565

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 2073,
+  "total_transitions": 112352
+}

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e7f1d3cabcf310e4f6579f8d79db5b6ca9e6cb8c218d840ca5d728e17f8a9d72
+size 189294

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 10919,
+  "total_transitions": 111527
+}

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6f537764e3ba64873ce0be3e727efce7efa3b3ee9a512520fdff8fe7b9f23660
+size 357786

models/subword_markov/chy_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 25260,
+  "total_transitions": 110702
+}

models/subword_ngram/chy_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2ed544f13314cfc2324a3b1462dfcc47e71f1236aeb6319b89b7d6e18ac3920a
+size 14546

models/subword_ngram/chy_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_ngrams": 1127,
+  "total_ngrams": 113177
+}

models/subword_ngram/chy_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4b077e5de241ab6ccaa7e1f45221e1202536459be7a01c5b4b63e9fd20ba730d
+size 54182

models/subword_ngram/chy_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_ngrams": 4876,
+  "total_ngrams": 112352
+}

models/subword_ngram/chy_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9b1c577153cd04ac40d0b50f9a07ec2270c218aff4d156a1ece01fd0edfec031
+size 130151

models/subword_ngram/chy_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_ngrams": 11151,
+  "total_ngrams": 111527
+}

models/tokenizer/chy_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c71f72411f24cc631cd9f61bb3360c8a91877e246b11a2af3c2ce3fe5aafda3c
+size 494718

models/tokenizer/chy_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:17ad6a6d3558277d6925eb68f3855cb005e2fe3557d8485bf68a6f7274296dab
+size 375317

models/vocabulary/chy_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:470592a0b112b9a3a65f69af1557219cccb407f27f3a4236e60e71c7c2f40313
+size 29068

models/vocabulary/chy_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+{
+  "language": "chy",
+  "vocabulary_size": 1659,
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.24974895150333748,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.4891015417331207,
+      "top_1000": 0.7703939984641739
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 2569,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.6076158940397351,
+    "total_documents": 825
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6fb77d185c917a1f8ece3debd54279262bbc2e1a01799fcb691731a7561bee31
+size 113562

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 4255,
+  "total_transitions": 27559
+}

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx2_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c1602a760151707012bb6aef66d181795727fa9d8cb5780233a0b6c1c90a2312
+size 189750

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx2_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 10197,
+  "total_transitions": 26734
+}

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx3_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7a91e6dbb80dac8f5da14abcdfc3ba5c7122ed0a171bc88e3d506ea5a62e4790
+size 251639

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx3_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 13745,
+  "total_transitions": 25909
+}

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx4_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b827d8d8deb6ee8ee5a1c2f7e9164c6009220d08c889406bed208c143c67ef6f
+size 299200

models/word_markov/chy_markov_ctx4_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_contexts": 16004,
+  "total_transitions": 25085
+}

models/word_ngram/chy_2gram_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0dc44fada7846034391ea2690c56b864a908054940a91ca581f91cf63ba43b79
+size 11396

models/word_ngram/chy_2gram_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_ngrams": 654,
+  "total_ngrams": 27559
+}

models/word_ngram/chy_3gram_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ac58b70ff5ea478cd859a06e2722ba50d36f1d0a7d83c8e35282a144a67b1369
+size 20739

models/word_ngram/chy_3gram_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_ngrams": 1211,
+  "total_ngrams": 26734
+}

models/word_ngram/chy_4gram_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8fb9ac65e984d6fb53483e3e4ddaf089e90baeef0b877dc6f9e5067d9f4d0a9d
+size 39062

models/word_ngram/chy_4gram_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "chy",
+  "unique_ngrams": 2302,
+  "total_ngrams": 25909
+}