Datasets:
text stringclasses 5
values |
|---|
static |
static |
distractor |
static |
threat |
threat |
threat |
threat |
translating |
translating |
threat |
threat |
threat |
threat |
receding |
distractor |
translating |
threat |
threat |
threat |
translating |
static |
static |
threat |
static |
static |
translating |
receding |
static |
translating |
threat |
static |
static |
threat |
receding |
receding |
threat |
threat |
threat |
threat |
distractor |
threat |
receding |
threat |
threat |
threat |
translating |
threat |
static |
translating |
threat |
receding |
distractor |
static |
receding |
distractor |
static |
translating |
distractor |
threat |
static |
threat |
receding |
static |
distractor |
threat |
distractor |
threat |
distractor |
translating |
threat |
distractor |
translating |
threat |
threat |
threat |
static |
threat |
distractor |
threat |
threat |
translating |
static |
threat |
threat |
static |
threat |
static |
static |
threat |
static |
static |
receding |
threat |
translating |
receding |
static |
threat |
static |
receding |
YAML Metadata Warning:The task_categories "time-series-classification" is not in the official list: text-classification, token-classification, table-question-answering, question-answering, zero-shot-classification, translation, summarization, feature-extraction, text-generation, fill-mask, sentence-similarity, text-to-speech, text-to-audio, automatic-speech-recognition, audio-to-audio, audio-classification, audio-text-to-text, voice-activity-detection, depth-estimation, image-classification, object-detection, image-segmentation, text-to-image, image-to-text, image-to-image, image-to-video, unconditional-image-generation, video-classification, reinforcement-learning, robotics, tabular-classification, tabular-regression, tabular-to-text, table-to-text, multiple-choice, text-ranking, text-retrieval, time-series-forecasting, text-to-video, image-text-to-text, image-text-to-image, image-text-to-video, visual-question-answering, document-question-answering, zero-shot-image-classification, graph-ml, mask-generation, zero-shot-object-detection, text-to-3d, image-to-3d, image-feature-extraction, video-text-to-text, keypoint-detection, visual-document-retrieval, any-to-any, video-to-video, other
FlyLoom-v1: Event-Camera Looming Detection Benchmark
The first standardized benchmark for biologically-inspired looming detection.
Dataset Description
FlyLoom-v1 simulates a fly's eye watching approaching objects. The task: detect looming threats (predators on collision course) and trigger an escape reflex β before impact.
This benchmark was developed alongside FlyReflexNet, a connectome-constrained spiking neural network that matches standard ML accuracy at 124Γ fewer operations.
Key Features
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Total samples | 11,000 |
| Input shape | (T=10, C=2, H=32, W=32) |
| Input type | Binary event tensor (ON/OFF polarities) |
| Event sparsity | ~3% per frame (matches real DVS cameras) |
| Task | Binary classification + timing |
| Classes | 5 stimulus types, 2 labels |
Splits
| Split | Samples | Threats | Non-threats |
|---|---|---|---|
| train | 8,000 | 3,236 | 4,764 |
| val | 1,000 | 410 | 590 |
| test | 2,000 | 760 | 1,240 |
Stimulus Classes
Based on the classical Drosophila escape paradigm (Card & Dickinson 2008):
| Class | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Threat | 1 | Dark disc looming on collision course β escape required |
| Distractor | 0 | Dark disc looming but veering away β tests specificity |
| Translating | 0 | Dark disc moving sideways at constant size |
| Receding | 0 | Dark disc shrinking (moving away) |
| Static | 0 | Dark disc not moving |
Usage
With Hugging Face Datasets
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("mayank171717/FlyLoom-v1")
# Access splits
train = ds["train"]
val = ds["validation"]
test = ds["test"]
# Get a sample
sample = train[0]
events = sample["events"] # (10, 2, 32, 32) uint8
label = sample["label"] # 0 or 1
impact = sample["impact"] # step when predator strikes (-1 if non-threat)
kind = sample["kind"] # "threat", "distractor", etc.
With PyTorch (Direct)
import numpy as np
import torch
from torch.utils.data import Dataset
class FlyLoomV1(Dataset):
def __init__(self, split="train"):
base = "path/to/FlyLoom_v1"
self.events = np.load(f"{base}/{split}/events.npy")
self.labels = np.load(f"{base}/{split}/labels.npy")
def __len__(self):
return len(self.labels)
def __getitem__(self, idx):
return (
torch.from_numpy(self.events[idx].astype(np.float32)),
int(self.labels[idx])
)
The Task
Given a 10-step event stream, output a binary fire decision:
1= JUMP (looming threat detected)0= HOLD FIRE (safe)
Timing matters. For threats, the model should fire before impact_step. Later detection = lower survival.
Metrics
| Metric | Description | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Survival rate | % of threats detected before impact | β |
| False alarm rate | % of non-threats that triggered escape | β |
| Reaction time | Mean steps-to-fire Γ 10 ms | β |
| Operations/sample | Computational cost | β |
Benchmark Results
| Model | Survival β | False Alarm β | Ops/sample β |
|---|---|---|---|
| Random | 50% | 50% | 0 |
| Flat-pixel GRU | 96.7% | 0.8% | 4,059,530 |
| GRU + retinal encoder | 98.8% | 0.1% | 408,310 |
| Spiking Fly (Phase 7) | 96.2% | 13.8% | 1,458 |
| Spiking Fly + Neuromod (ours) | 99.3% | 0.6% | 3,296 |
Our model matches GRU accuracy with 124Γ fewer operations.
Biological Grounding
This dataset reproduces stimuli from real Drosophila escape experiments:
- Gabbiani et al. (1999) β The Ξ· = l/|v| computation in LGMD neurons
- Card & Dickinson (2008) β Visually mediated motor planning in fly escape
- von Reyn et al. (2014) β Giant Fiber pathway for escape triggering
Our model's reaction times show the same qualitative dependence on the r/v looming parameter as real flies.
Dataset Generation
Fully reproducible with fixed seed:
# The exact parameters used (from manifest.json)
{
"seed": 42,
"T": 10,
"H": 32,
"W": 32,
"event_threshold": 0.08,
"shot_noise": 0.001,
"class_weights": {
"threat": 0.4,
"translating": 0.15,
"receding": 0.15,
"static": 0.15,
"distractor": 0.15
}
}
File Structure
FlyLoom_v1/
βββ manifest.json # Full config + stats
βββ train/
β βββ events.npy # (8000, 10, 2, 32, 32) uint8
β βββ labels.npy # (8000,) int8
β βββ impact.npy # (8000,) int8
β βββ kinds.json # list of 8000 strings
βββ val/
β βββ ...
βββ test/
βββ ...
Citation
@dataset{flyloom2025,
author = {Mewar, Mayank},
title = {FlyLoom-v1: Event-Camera Looming Detection Benchmark},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Hugging Face},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/mayank171717/FlyLoom-v1}
}
If you use this for biological comparisons, also cite:
@article{card2008,
title={Visually mediated motor planning in the escape response of Drosophila},
author={Card, Gwyneth and Dickinson, Michael H},
journal={Current Biology},
year={2008}
}
@article{gabbiani1999,
title={Computation of object approach by a wide-field motion-sensitive neuron},
author={Gabbiani, Fabrizio and Krapp, Holger G and Laurent, Gilles},
journal={Journal of Neuroscience},
year={1999}
}
License
CC-BY 4.0 β Free to use, remix, and redistribute with attribution.
Links
- Code: GitHub repository (update with your actual repo)
- Paper: (coming soon)
Contact
For questions or collaborations, open an issue on GitHub or contact via Hugging Face.
- Downloads last month
- 89